Getting started in SJ
On this page
Situational Judgement is the final UCAT section.
You must decide the relative importance of factors and the relative appropriateness of responses in clinical or educational scenarios.
The main task in Situational Judgement is applying ethical and professional principles to real-world scenarios. In doing so, you must pick the same answer as the panel of medical experts who have decided the relative importance or appropriateness.
This means you must learn the fundamental principles and adjust your approach in applying these principles to a wide range of scenarios in different lifelike contexts.
However, there’s a further twist: you must decide the best answer based on a particular character’s perspective in the scenario. Therefore, you must learn to analyse the characters and setting in order to apply the key principles quickly and accurately.
Your answers in the Situational section will assess your ability to:
- Understand realistic workplace scenarios
- Assess professionalism
- Prioritise actions
- Demonstrate ethical reasoning
The main focus is on your judgement, decision-making and interpersonal skills, which are crucial for patient care and teamwork in healthcare settings.
The section comprises around 23 to 25 scenarios, with up to 6 questions each.
- Most scenarios have 3 or 4 questions
- 69 questions in total
- 1.5 minutes to read the instructions
- 26 minutes to answer the questions
Allow 30 seconds to read each scenario and find the key problems.
Try to answer each question in 10 seconds.
Almost all Situational questions ask about appropriateness or importance. These questions have 4 answer choices and appear in multi-question sets.
Four questions are in a drag-and-drop format. These are standalone questions – each question has its own scenario.
As the multiple choice answers are fixed for each question type, with practice you won’t need to read the answer choices in this section, apart from the handful of drag-and-drop questions.
This will allow you more time to focus on reading the scenarios and question stems carefully.
No medical or diagnostic knowledge is tested in the Situational section.
It’s a measure of your judgement when faced with the kind of ethical and professional dilemmas you’ll encounter as a medical or dental student, or a full time practitioner.
To score highly in this section, you must:
- Base your judgements on professional values such as honesty, integrity, empathy and respect.
- Identify the most appropriate actions to take in challenging or high-pressure situations.
- Balance competing priorities while maintaining high ethical and professional standards.
Therefore, you must learn the ethical and professional principles that are tested again and again in Situational scenarios. It’s all about interpersonal interactions and doing the right thing, not the specific details of patient diagnosis and treatment.
Medical jargon is kept to a minimum.
- You must have a broad sense of the responsibilities of a medical student in a clinical setting and how these differ from the duties of a junior doctor or consultant.
- You need to have an understanding of basic clinical activities such as ward rounds and handovers.
- You don’t need any particular knowledge about basic procedures like taking bloods and administering sutures, but you should understand how they fit into a medical student’s training in a clinical environment, such as a hospital ward or GP surgery.
You aren’t expected to know anything about particular conditions a patient might be suffering, or how the different departments in a hospital operate.
You are expected to know the basics of professional behaviour in clinical settings, which includes asking the right person to help with a problem based on their given role and experience.
Remember that the Situational section will be very challenging at first for all UCAT students, who will have limited exposure to clinical settings.
If you’re a teenager, you’ll also likely have minimal workplace experience. As a result, you must train your brain to see any relevant aspects of the scenario that might be more readily ‘obvious’ to someone older who has spent significant time as a patient or as part of the care team.
On the plus side, these relevant aspects are repetitive across scenarios, so you can learn to spot them, even when they are implied or minimally mentioned.
Walkthrough
SJ scenarios
Let's take a detailed look at the scenario of a Situational Judgement set.
In Appropriateness sets, you must evaluate the appropriateness of various responses to an ethical or professional dilemma.
Each question is a response, which you must assess according to levels of appropriateness.
You need to make this evaluation from the perspective of a particular character in the scenario, known as the decider. You must take care to read the scenario from the decider’s perspective. Otherwise, you’re likely to struggle to pick correct answers.
There are three formats for Appropriateness sets in Situational Judgement:
- Regular Appropriateness
- Appropriateness with quotes
- Most/Least Appropriate
The first and second of these formats have four fixed responses.
You must click on one answer choice per response.
The third format, Most/Least Appropriate, is a drag and drop exercise.
You must drag two of the three responses and drop them into the correct boxes.
The vast majority of Appropriateness sets have four fixed answers.
For regular Appropriateness, you need to distinguish between:
A. A very appropriate thing to do
B. Appropriate, but not ideal
C. Inappropriate, but not awful
D. A very inappropriate thing to do
For Appropriateness with quotes, you need to distinguish between:
A. A very appropriate thing to say
B. Appropriate, but not ideal
C. Inappropriate, but not awful
D. A very inappropriate thing to say
Sets of these types can include different numbers of responses.
The shortest sets have only two responses; the longest sets might have six.
Walkthrough question
Regular Appropriateness sets
Let’s take our first look at a regular Appropriateness scenario and two responses.
In Importance sets, you must evaluate the importance of various factors in considering how to respond to an ethical or professional dilemma.
You need to make this evaluation from the perspective of a particular character in the scenario, known as the decider.
Each question is a factor, which you must assess according to four levels of importance.
Importance sets have four fixed answers you need to distinguish between:
A. Very important
B. Important
C. Of minor importance
D. Not important at all
Sets differ in the number of factors you need to evaluate. Short sets have only two factors; the longest sets might have six.
When you take the UCAT, the Importance sets will appear at the beginning of the Situational section.
We at Medify will normally cover Importance after Appropriateness, as Importance tends to be the more challenging format.
We recommend that you learn the answer logic and strategies for regular Appropriateness sets first. Once you are familiar with Appropriateness, use what you learned as a starting point when you move onto Importance.
On Test Day, given the time restraints involved and the large number of sets, we advise working through the sets in the order they appear.
Walkthrough question
Importance sets
Let’s take our first look at an Importance scenario and two factors.